The author reflects on receiving strong initial backlash for many of their investment idea
The author reflects on receiving strong initial backlash for many of their investment ideas, but notes that market performance eventually validated the underlying theses, citing specific tickers and the reactions they faced.
“I think u must be new here. Many of my ideas get intense backlash at the start, especially the more original they are. $AXTI - endless hate to the point I got banned from the $RDDT WSB forum. They thought it was some scam Chinese company, but Reuters, Epiwafer company earnings, and institutions validated their InP substrate position many months later. $RPI - everyone called it some meme stock. Literally Bloomberg, Financial Times, and others went out and called it a meme stock with no fundamentals. Analysts went and said the idea was stupid and said it was going to crash “as a fact”. Earnings came out? Blew away any projection with 58% fwd revenue growth. But they seem to have forgot all the backlash they threw out at me, while they’re citing it as a high growth ai hardware company no. $SIVE? Everyone called it a “meme stock”. I get bunch of hate from Swedish media all the way up. Bunch of people didn’t understand the technical nuances, and they keep throwing personal attacks for some strange reason. But as you know it’s probably my most successful idea and it’s validated so far by institutional buying from Fidelity Research, JP Morgan as well as formally announced partnerships from $JBL to $GFS. Same hate with: - $AAOI at $30, when everyone called management a “scam” or “shady” - $LITE at $300 when everyone called photonics a “bubble” - $RKLB at $20 when everyone thought it was a low revenue launch company that was a bubble. I actually got temp banned from WSB from posting about Rocketlab since moderators didn’t like the stock. - $HOOD at $20 when everyone recalled them freezing GME buys/sells - $IQE at $12 when people thought it was just some random crap $100m company over in the UK with “no actual photonics partnerships” - $SOI at $44 when European bank analysts thought it was “overvalued”and my thesis wasn’t anything new - $NBIS at $75 when everyone in the $IREN camp said I was spreading Russian propaganda and that they had no moat - $INTC at $115 when everyone thought they couldn’t compete with $TSM - $MRVL at $85 when everyone thought they were losing ASIC share to Broadcom. - $AEHR at $35 when everyone misread their earnings and thought they had no revenue - $EWY at $115 when everyone was crying KOSPI was a bubble and LNG/helium/oil would disrupt the memory trade Can go on and on… I do read a lot of the comments, which is why I remember a lot of the hate (probably either jealously, impression farming, or lacking the technical depth is my guess). But I think at this point, people can just see each thesis validated over and over again. And the success in markets drown out the old noise. Good thing is markets are the final arbiter of what’s right or wrong, not the angry comments or posts on X.”Original post:X / @aleabitoreddit ↗
Related stocks
Was called a scam at $30, but author's thesis was later validated.
Trade ↗Photonics was called a bubble at $300, but thesis proved correct.
Trade ↗Thought to be a low-revenue launch company; you were temp banned from WSB for posting about it. Thesis later validated.
Trade ↗Despite early accusations of being a scam Chinese company, Reuters reports, Epiwafer earnings, and institutional buying later confirmed the InP substrate position.
Trade ↗Dismissed as a meme stock by Bloomberg and FT, but earnings showed 58% forward revenue growth, validating the thesis.
Trade ↗Faced hate from Swedish media, but institutional buying from Fidelity, JP Morgan and partnerships with JBL and GFS validated the idea.
Trade ↗At $20, people recalled the GME freeze, but the stock later recovered.
Trade ↗Dismissed as a random UK company with no photonics partnerships, but thesis validated.
Trade ↗Was accused of being Russian propaganda with no moat, but thesis later validated.
Trade ↗Everyone thought they couldn't compete with TSM at $115, but thesis proved correct.
Trade ↗Thought to be losing ASIC share to Broadcom, but thesis validated.
Trade ↗