作者描述了一个反复出现的模式：散户投资者在趋势早期买入，机构在负面报道和低目标价后积累股份，随后股价创下历史新高。当前例子包括$SIVE，作者指出$FOCI (3363)可能成为$
作者描述了一个反复出现的模式：散户投资者在趋势早期买入，机构在负面报道和低目标价后积累股份，随后股价创下历史新高。当前例子包括$SIVE，作者指出$FOCI (3363)可能成为$NVDA和$TSM光学项目的瓶颈，并有公司建议在低估值时卖出。
“Basically this… and it’s how cycles work. Retail was early and completely frontran institutions on next architectural shifts. There was close to 0 US institutional ownership on $SIVE. And now you see active institutions like JP Morgan, Fidelity Research, and others on the cap table. Happened last year with $NBIS. > I called out close to <30% institutional accumulation and said they wanted more shares. > institutions bought up majority of the float > bunch of negative articles back then, now it’s positive and ATHs. Two years before it was $RKLB > Was long at $16, but institutional analysts kept giving record low PTs and told retail to sell, although it had such a high reusable rocket rate. > retail sold, institutional ownership stocked up > now it’s ATHs I expect Foci (3363) to be a bottleneck for both $NVDA and $TSM optical programs and now there’s firms implying you to sell that at $2.5B valuations alongside $HIMX. So if you see negative sellside reports or an uncanny wave of negative news, if’s a good signal they need liquidity. Recently some smaller hedge funds have been so desperate that they’re likely even using bot farms on X that told retail to sell lol… which I’ve uncovered recently. Regardless, it’s also why I spend a lot of time doing research on individual names so people can build their own conviction in the face of noise. Unfortunately, it’s just a part of life how the modern liquidity cycles/transfers of US retail -> Institutions work. They don’t work in the best interest of retail investors.”原帖：X / @aleabitoreddit ↗